Почему я люблю лето.
Есть на свете четыре времени года:
зима, весна, лето и осень.
Каждое из них приносит нам свои радости.
Но больше всего я люблю лето, потому что
наступают каникулы и не нужно ходить в школу.
Еще я люблю это время года, потому что становится тепло и красиво. Летом я всегда уезжаю загород, потому что все мои школьные друзья разъезжаются кто куда и в городе становится скучно. А на даче можно ходить на залив, загорать и купаться. Там у меня тоже много друзей и всё лето мы играем и веселимся. Еще можно кататься с папой на велосипеде и ходить в лес. А в огороде спеет много вкусных ягод и расцветают красивые цветы. Вот почему я люблю лето.
Стр. 55. ДЕЛУ ВРЕМЯ – ПОТЕХЕ ЧАС
Найди в толковом словаре или Интернете значение слова время. Запиши определение своими словами.
Перед нами картина Аркадия Александровича Пластова " Первый снег".
На картине изображён момент снегопада. Выпал первый пушистый снег и укрыл землю белым ковром. В воздухе плавно кружатся снежинки. Стоит старый дом с заснеженной крышей, рядом усыпанная снегом березка и важно ходит ворона. На крыльцо вышли счастливые дети и любуются падающим снегом.
Мне картинапонравилась. Она очень красивая, передает чувство радости и праздника.
Перед нами картина Василия Андреевича Тропинина «Кружевница». На картине изображена девочка с темными волосами, в светлом платье и с косынкой на плечах. Девочка мило улыбается, у нее очень добрый и приветливый взгляд, На столе стоит подушка- валик, на ней блестящая ткань. В одной руке девочка держит булавку,а в другой коклюшку. Она старательно и с удовольствием плетёт кружево.
Мне картина понравилась. Она очень красивая, вызывает чувство легкости и тепла.
http://shkolnikzloy.ru/lektsii/uroki/praktika-uroki/kontrolnye-raboty-po-matematike-4-klass-programma-shkola-rossii/
http://kopilkaurokov.ru/nachalniyeKlassi/prochee/102137
http://uchu24.ru/video/edinicy-masy-tablica-edinic-masy.html
http://bookgdz.ru/uchebniki-4-klass/10948-chitat-kontrolnye-raboty-matematika-1-4-klass-volkova-onlain
Read the passage below.
What can a constitutional monarch like Elizabeth II, prohibited from exercising any real power, actually do to justify her country's steady devotion—the crowds who line up to cheer when she passes, her face on each coin and bill and postage stamp, a national anthem that beseeches God to save her? What does she really do to earn something for which respect is way too small a word?
A The Queen is acutely aware that the continued success of the monarchy depends on the careful nurturing of popular consent—and that a peculiar danger of being the best-known woman in the world for over half a century is becoming background noise, ubiquitous but forgotten. Her press secretary, Penny Russell-Smith, says that the last 15 years of coverage, focused mostly on the misadventures of the younger royals, has created "a generation of readers and viewers who aren't aware of what the Queen's work is all about." The antidote is more exposure. So not for the Queen a quiet retirement: she plans to keep working, and for people to see her working, as long as she can manage.
B There is not much she can do entirely at her own whim. Technically, she could dissolve Parliament to get rid of a Prime Minister she disliked, but it would provoke an unthinkable constitutional crisis if she tried. Yet she still derives power from her twin roles as head of state— the one who opens and dissolves Parliament, makes splashy visits abroad and hosts dinners for foreign leaders—and head of nation, a focus for British unity and identity, rewarder of excellence, a visible oasis of continuity in an accelerating world, even as Prime Ministers (she's had 10) come and go. A clutch of other symbolic roles—Head of the Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, chief of the armed forces—reinforce a peculiar kind of omnipresence in public life. In a media-soaked age, that is a fantastic asset.
C It is a balmy period in her 54-year reign. The tabloid fodder of Charles and Diana, Andrew and Fergie, the death of her beloved mother at 101, are all behind her. Charles is at long last married to Camilla, which according to courtiers has reassured his parents about his long-term soundness; Princes William and Harry appear to be well launched. Her country is prosperous and generally content with her performance. According to a poll commissioned by Buckingham Palace in January and seen by time, only 19% would like to switch to a republic—one more percentage point than in 1969.
D Just a few years ago, few would have predicted such an outcome. That republicanism has no political fraction after a period when many Windsors acted less as exemplars than as reality-TV stars is due largely to the Queen. She may be remote, but her dedication to duty gets widespread respect. It could hardly be otherwise. Since 1952, she has received more than 3 million letters, hosted around 1.1 million guests at her garden parties, and made 256 official overseas visits to 129 countries. Asked to explain his mother's relationship with the country, Prince Andrew says: "It's slightly complicated for people to grasp the idea of a head of state in human form, but I would put her appeal down to consistency. In their eyes, she's never let them down."
E The Queen wants the monarchy to be a focus for continuity and enduring patriotic values, which make instinctive sense to her. She was never a rebel: she venerated her father, a shy man with a stutter who was thrust into kingship by the abdication but mastered his task through hard work. During her wartime adolescence, the idea of obedience and doing one's duty for the greater good was the norm. She really meant it when she said at age 21 that "my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service," and has not changed her core old-fashioned values. But for the monarchy as an institution, she is averse to risk, not to change itself; she knows staying still has its risks, too.
F The Queen has also subtly refurbished the most public aspect of her work—her interaction with ordinary people. She has never been naturally extroverted, perhaps a reaction to growing up so famous that as a child she had a territory named after her in Antarctica and was immortalized in Madame Tussaud's astride a pony. But over the years the Queen has learned to make encounters more enjoyable—and memorable. When she grants honors, she studies biographies of each recipient and writes down a few words which an aide reads to her as the person approaches, allowing her to start an informed conversation—one she knows will be repeated to family and friends. (She reads fast and has a flypaper memory.) Dinners during regional trips used to strand her at the top of a long table with predictable dignitaries; now she will be at a round table with perhaps a nurse, the leader of the local Sikh temple and an entrepreneur. Parties at Buckingham Palace are increasingly built around themes, like honoring transport workers and members of the emergency services after the London bombings of July 2005.
G What does the Queen herself have to do with these changes? Does she benignly preside while staffers take the initiative, or is she a hands-on manager? Her staff say that she is almost spookily well-informed and observant. Prince Andrew says, in some awe, "The Queen's intelligence network is a hell of a lot better than anyone's in this palace. She knows everything. Everything. She just knows. I don't know how she does it." The Queen will spot tiny errors in memos, and approves details as small as bedroom assignments and whether a photographer may stand in a corner at a state banquet. She doesn't usually get cross. "Do you really think so?" is usually enough to signal staff they are proceeding down a dead end. But as for changing the fundamental ways the palace works, she sticks with her instinctive pattern and mostly waits for suggestions.
H She is a consistently popular boss— which has not always been true for all members of the royal family. People stay a long time, and they don't get rich. It's because she's wonderful to work for. You cannot bluff, you cannot pull the wool over her eyes. You get clear direction, never ambiguous, and once a decision is made, it's not changed. The hardest thing about the job is ever letting her down.
I Does she like her job? Does she never tire of the grind, the rigid code of behavior, the deluge of small talk? Her diaries, carefully tended, may give the answer, but they will not be seen until after her death. She once said she would have liked to be a woman living in the country with lots of horses and dogs. Most likely, the concept of liking her job would seem odd to her. Prince Andrew explains: "People say to me, 'Your life must be very strange.' But of course I've not experienced any other life. It's not strange to me. The same way with the Queen. She has never experienced anything else. That life, that knowledge, that wisdom is purely natural to her." The Queen is very religious, but she is also philosophical. She feels she must do the job she has been given and that it will be for others to judge whether she has succeeded.
J Her staff is organizing her schedule to keep her visible and active with less strain by hosting more events at Buckingham Palace, and when she travels, seeing more people at slightly fewer venues. Her children will pick up more of her duties. But all who know her say that barring physical collapse, she will not abdicate in favor of Charles.
K Given that she intends to remain firmly at the helm, where will she steer the monarchy now? The polls reveal some directions in which imperceptible change - or more - is needed. The palace already works to include more ethnic minorities and representatives of non-Christian faiths in the Queen's events, but can be expected to do more of this. Another area the Queen can develop is what is called the "welfare monarchy": the royal family assisting charities and groups that help the disadvantaged. British monarchs have been doing this since at least Victoria; the Queen is already patron of 620 voluntary organizations.
L And what, in the end, does she want as the legacy of her Elizabethan Age? In the way of monarchies, one part of the answer is already determined: Charles, then William. At this stage they appear to be a good bet. But, in the end, everything will depend on choices the future Kings themselves will make. As for the institution of the monarchy, the Queen's track record reveals what she wants to leave behind: a Crown relentlessly pragmatic enough to stay popular.
TIME, APRIL 17, 2006 by J.F.O. McAllister
Дата добавления: 2014-12-15; просмотров: 45 | Поможем написать вашу работу | Нарушение авторских прав |