Читайте также: |
|
Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology
ISSN: 1823-1144
Vol. 1, No. 2, December 2004
Http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit/articles/V1N2-final/MOJIT-013-Norliana.htm
A Conceptual Framework for Enhancing the Instructional Design Process
Norliana Ab Maleh 1, Chien-Sing Lee 2, Chin-Kuan Ho 3 and Hwee-Reei Chong 4
Faculty of Information Technology,
Multimedia University,
Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
norliana.maleh@mmu.edu.my1, cslee@mmu.edu.my2, ckho@mmu.edu.my3, hrchong@mmu.edu.my4
Abstract
Learning Management Systems (LMSs) and Learning Content Management Systems (LCMSs) are platforms which enable meaningful interaction between instructors, administrators and students with regards to Web-based and classroom training. The distinction between the two management systems lies in the added authoring functionality in LCMSs. This paper examines the differences between LMS and LCMS, compares the latest authoring tools in the market and finally presents automated instructional design in the Ontological Instructional Design (OntoID) authoring tool, a Java and XML -based Authoring Tool. The ultimate aim is to scaffold the instructional design process.
INTRODUCTION
Instructional Design is a systematic approach to developing effective learning materials for different learning contexts through the process of analysing, designing, developing and evaluating instruction. The Ontological Instructional Design (OntoID), an automated instructional design tool aims to achieve the above goal. The OntoID serves to provide instructors with an integrated modelling and development interface. The modelling interface helps the instructor to visualise the association of concepts in order to systematically design and develop learning materials. On the other hand, the development interface provides tools for designing Web pages without the need to know Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) programming. Reuse of learning materials from a learning objects repository further facilitates the development process and enables faster deployment.
This paper first presents the framework for authoring tools, the Learning Content Management System (LCMS) as contrasted to the more popularly known Learning Management System (LMS). The second section compares different authoring tools in the market which incorporates automated instructional design. The aim is to compare the degree in which instructional design and reusability have been incorporated into these authoring tools. This is followed by a discussion on modeling, development and reusability in the OntoID authoring tool. The paper concludes with results from a pilot test.
Дата добавления: 2015-09-10; просмотров: 96 | Поможем написать вашу работу | Нарушение авторских прав |